<rss xmlns:a10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Antitrust and competition</title><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/rss/antitrust-and-competition</link><description>Recent blog posts</description><language>en</language><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{AFA9137C-298C-4542-808C-6A68A09CA9EF}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2023/09/spotlight-on-gaming-key-takeaways-from-gamescom-and-devcom</link><category>Blog post</category><category>Technology</category><category>Antitrust and competition</category><title>Spotlight on gaming: Key takeaways from Gamescom and Devcom</title><description>The gaming industry has always been an early adopter of artificial intelligence (AI) and we are already seeing how it enhances virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) gaming experiences.</description><pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2023 16:08:00 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"></dc:creator></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{017B1232-A631-4868-B1CC-03D8F7B5FF9C}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2022/11/exclusionary-practices-by-dominant-players-in-light-of-recent-case-law-in-the-digital-sector</link><category>Antitrust and competition</category><category>Technology</category><category>Blog post</category><title>Exclusionary practices by dominant players in light of recent case law in the digital sector?</title><description>On 14 September 2022, the General Court confirmed the decision of the European Commission fining Google for having imposed unlawful restrictions on manufacturers of Android mobile devices and mobile network operators to consolidate its dominant position on the search engine market. </description><pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2022 15:04:07 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"></dc:creator></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{B34FF419-E9FE-4F7D-A8D6-655E7FF89E93}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2022/09/a-new-approach-to-referrals-under-the-eu-merger-regulation</link><a10:author><a10:name>Heiko Bertelmann</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Sean Murphy</a10:name></a10:author><category>Antitrust and competition</category><category>Corporate</category><category>Regulation</category><category>Technology</category><category>Life sciences and healthcare</category><category>Blog post</category><title>A new approach to referrals under the EU Merger Regulation</title><description>The European Commission (along with the US FTC and DOJ, UK CMA, German FCO and others), has been focused on ensuring that so-called “killer acquisitions” in the digital and life sciences sectors are reviewed. Against this background, the General Court’s decision in Illumina/Grail is of key importance to companies acquiring start-ups.</description><pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2022 09:06:05 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Heiko Bertelmann, Sean Murphy</dc:creator></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{9EB18680-64E6-459A-9916-06DFDDD86197}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2022/02/new-eu-anti-subsidy-regulation-is-the-tech-sector-ready</link><a10:author><a10:name>Jay Modrall</a10:name></a10:author><category>Technology</category><category>Blog post</category><category>Antitrust and competition</category><title>New EU Anti-Subsidy Regulation: Is the tech sector ready?</title><description>The European Union’s (EU’s) proposed new competition law regime, the Anti-Subsidy Regulation, seems on track to be finalised by mid-2022 and to apply from early 2023. The Anti-Subsidy Regulation was formally proposed in May 2021 but closely tracks a 2020 white paper. It will create mandatory new M&amp;A notification and approval requirements based on a broad new group-wide, global financial metric, “financial contributions,” starting with multinationals’ 2020 financial years.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;This article considers the proposal and its impact on the technology sector.</description><pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2022 09:30:00 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jay Modrall</dc:creator></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{A1F417BE-E75F-4692-A06E-0FD50F3EF891}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2021/12/the-uks-new-nsi-regime-what-do-you-need-to-know</link><a10:author><a10:name>Ian Giles</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Glenn Hall</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Caroline Thomas</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Chris Pearson</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Emma de Ronde</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Mark Daniels</a10:name></a10:author><category>Blog post</category><category>Antitrust and competition</category><category>Corporate</category><category>UK</category><category>Technology</category><title>The UK's new NSI regime</title><description>The UK’s new, more extensive national security regime enters into force on January 4, 2022.</description><pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2021 15:25:06 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ian Giles, Glenn Hall, Caroline Thomas, Chris Pearson, Emma de Ronde, Mark Daniels</dc:creator></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{E4F31296-C9E8-4916-969C-8EC9ADCF3409}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2021/08/antitrust-in-the-biden-administration</link><a10:author><a10:name>Robin Adelstein</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Layne E. Kruse</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Abraham Chang</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Mark Angland</a10:name></a10:author><category>Antitrust and competition</category><category>Technology</category><category>Blog post</category><title>Antitrust in the Biden Administration</title><description>The "Executive Order", issued by Biden in July, challenges the use of monopoly power by dominant industry players in the technology sector</description><pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2021 06:29:08 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robin Adelstein, Layne E. Kruse, Abraham Chang, Mark Angland</dc:creator></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{78689AF3-4960-45B4-B842-F779E6684AED}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2021/05/technology-joint-ventures-partnering-for-the-future</link><a10:author><a10:name>Jill Gauntlett</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Victoria Birch</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Mike Knapper</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Dominic Stuttaford</a10:name></a10:author><category>Antitrust and competition</category><category>Corporate</category><category>Data protection</category><category>Intellectual property</category><category>Regulation</category><category>Tax</category><category>UK</category><category>Technology</category><category>Blog post</category><title>Technology joint ventures: Partnering for the future</title><description>This article examines the key aspects of joint ventures in the technology sector and the particular issues and challenges that these joint ventures raise.</description><pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2021 13:04:00 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jill Gauntlett, Victoria Birch, Mike Knapper, Dominic Stuttaford</dc:creator></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{3AA50F97-2FE3-440E-89AA-62CEB08558DA}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2021/01/eu-commission-scales-vertical-block-exemption-mountain</link><a10:author><a10:name>Jay Modrall</a10:name></a10:author><category>Antitrust and competition</category><category>Technology</category><category>Publication</category><category>Blog post</category><title>EU Commission scales Vertical Block Exemption Mountain</title><description>Jay Modrall discusses recent changes to the EU antitrust reform agenda, including the long-awaited consultation on reform of the Vertical Block Exemption Regulation (the VBER) and related Guidelines, published on December 18, 2020.</description><pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2021 15:39:02 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jay Modrall</dc:creator></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{0D5AB81D-12F3-4591-AD64-CD7D1292FBA1}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2021/01/shaken-not-stirred-eu-mixes-big-tech-regulation-and-antitrust</link><a10:author><a10:name>Jay Modrall</a10:name></a10:author><category>Antitrust and competition</category><category>Technology</category><category>Publication</category><category>Blog post</category><category>Data</category><title>Shaken, not stirred: EU mixes big tech regulation and antitrust</title><description>Jay Modrall discusses the Digital Markets Act (DMA), the European Commission’s regulatory agenda and ongoing antitrust reform agenda in a recent article published by InformaConnect.</description><pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2021 11:03:15 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jay Modrall</dc:creator></item></channel></rss>