<rss xmlns:a10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>August 2021</title><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/rss/august-2021</link><description>Recent blog posts</description><language>en</language><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{E4F31296-C9E8-4916-969C-8EC9ADCF3409}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2021/08/antitrust-in-the-biden-administration</link><a10:author><a10:name>Robin Adelstein</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Layne E. Kruse</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Abraham Chang</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Mark Angland</a10:name></a10:author><category>Antitrust and competition</category><category>Technology</category><category>Blog post</category><title>Antitrust in the Biden Administration</title><description>The "Executive Order", issued by Biden in July, challenges the use of monopoly power by dominant industry players in the technology sector</description><pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2021 06:29:08 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robin Adelstein, Layne E. Kruse, Abraham Chang, Mark Angland</dc:creator></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{29EE851A-3B8F-481C-9C05-9EEA56629826}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2021/08/osfi-announces-new-requirements-for-reporting-technology-and-cyber-incidents-part-1</link><a10:author><a10:name>Imran Ahmad</a10:name></a10:author><category>Canada</category><category>Data</category><category>Technology</category><category>Blog post</category><title>OSFI announces new requirements for reporting technology and cyber incidents: Part 1</title><description>The OSFI has released an updated Technology and Cyber Security Incident Reporting Advisory and new requirements for the Cyber Security Self-Assessment. Part one of this update will discuss the changes that have been made. </description><pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2021 16:06:23 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Imran Ahmad</dc:creator></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{B5640BC0-5326-4FDF-B4F6-32B8F8C5C87A}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2021/08/telemedicine-ads-limited-by-facebook</link><a10:author><a10:name>Kate Nelson</a10:name></a10:author><category>Ethics</category><category>Regulation</category><category>Technology</category><category>Life sciences and healthcare</category><category>Blog post</category><title>Telemedicine ads limited by Facebook</title><description>As the telemedicine industry continues to grow, especially in light of COVID-19, businesses should reconsider their policies and procedures in connection with telehealth services and user safety.</description><pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2021 09:51:39 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kate Nelson</dc:creator></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{B58CD34A-7EA2-48EE-9462-6990CFBA6241}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2021/08/dialing-in-adapting-to-virtual-shareholder-meetings</link><category>Corporate</category><category>Technology</category><title>Dialing in: Adapting to virtual shareholder meetings</title><description>In addition to technical issues and platform glitches, shareholders have expressed challenges during virtual-only meetings in the shift to a virtual world.</description><pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2021 10:16:45 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"></dc:creator></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{732217A5-6E82-4564-AFF5-D1FEA0C0B68F}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2021/08/new-immigration-routes-in-new-innovation-strategy</link><category>UK</category><category>Employment</category><category>Technology</category><category>Blog post</category><title>New Immigration Routes in Innovation Strategy</title><description>The UK government has a vision to make the UK a global hub for innovation by 2035.</description><pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2021 10:10:58 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"></dc:creator></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{BF62B4D3-5822-4BBF-A7CC-FF10F387F8A5}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2021/08/ip-monitor-government-of-canada-initiates-consultation-on-modernizing-copyright-framework</link><a10:author><a10:name>David Yi</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Maya Medeiros</a10:name></a10:author><category>Artificial intelligence</category><category>Canada</category><category>Internet of things</category><category>Regulation</category><category>Technology</category><category>Blog post</category><category>Intellectual property</category><title>IP monitor: Government of Canada initiates consultation on modernizing copyright framework for AI and the Internet of Things</title><description>The Canadian federal government has launched a public consultation on adapting Canada’s copyright framework to ongoing developments in artificial intelligence and the Internet of Things.</description><pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2021 10:20:35 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Yi, Maya Medeiros</dc:creator></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{126C0920-0ACF-4352-8C4E-6E43F4ACD2BE}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2021/08/ground-breaking-arbitration-rules-for-digital-disputes-released</link><a10:author><a10:name>Holly Stebbing</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Adam Sanitt</a10:name></a10:author><category>UK</category><category>Regulation</category><category>Corporate</category><category>Artificial intelligence</category><category>Technology</category><category>Blog post</category><title>Ground-breaking arbitration rules for digital disputes released</title><description>The Digital Dispute Resolution Rules (the Rules) is a revolutionary set of arbitration rules designed to provide a framework to govern disputes relating to disruptive novel technologies.</description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2021 09:38:20 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Holly Stebbing, Adam Sanitt</dc:creator></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{133CFC77-DF75-451B-9C69-F86E0F9F8FA6}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2021/08/rise-of-the-machines-federal-court-of-australia-holds-that-artificial-intelligence</link><a10:author><a10:name>Jackie O'Brien</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Isobel Taylor</a10:name></a10:author><category>Artificial intelligence</category><category>Technology</category><category>Blog post</category><category>Australia</category><category>UK</category><title>Rise of the machines: Federal Court of Australia holds that artificial intelligence can be a patent ‘inventor’</title><description>This decision represents the first judicial step worldwide towards the recognition of AI machines as inventors of patents, and is significant as it may signal a divergence between Australian patent law on this issue and other jurisdictions who have recently taken a different approach, including the EU and the UK.</description><pubDate>Sun, 08 Aug 2021 04:42:00 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jackie O'Brien, Isobel Taylor</dc:creator></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{32717212-F071-439F-B52E-CC18646172EE}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2021/08/proposed-canadian-law-to-regulate-social-media-companies-and-streaming-giants</link><a10:author><a10:name>Daniel Daniele</a10:name></a10:author><category>Canada</category><category>Corporate</category><category>Regulation</category><category>Technology</category><category>Blog post</category><title>Proposed Canadian law to regulate social media companies and streaming giants</title><description>The Bill proposes to subject social media platforms and streaming services to requirements similar to those imposed on traditional television and radio broadcasting companies in Canada.</description><pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2021 10:39:00 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daniel Daniele</dc:creator></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{9E44E5E0-F9E0-4AA4-82A5-8A28DEF4E17E}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2021/08/triple-point-technology-inc-v-ptt-public-company-ltd</link><a10:author><a10:name>Amy Joan Armitage</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Andrew Buisson</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Sean Murphy</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Simon Ramsden</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>James Russell</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Michael Sinclair</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Donald Warnock</a10:name></a10:author><category>Corporate</category><category>Regulation</category><category>Technology</category><category>Blog post</category><title>Triple Point Technology Inc v PTT Public Company Ltd</title><description>Triple Point Technology Inc v PTT Public Company Ltd will provide welcome clarity in relation to the drafting and interpretation of liquidated damages clauses in construction, commercial and technology contracts.</description><pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2021 09:35:13 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Amy Joan Armitage, Andrew Buisson, Sean Murphy, Simon Ramsden, James Russell, Michael Sinclair, Donald Warnock</dc:creator></item></channel></rss>