<rss xmlns:a10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>August 2025</title><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/rss/august-2025</link><description>Recent blog posts</description><language>en</language><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{3FAFFA93-1C34-43F4-8DAA-E2287565AE9D}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2025/08/artificial-intelligence-at-work-legal-issues-in-french-labour-law</link><a10:author><a10:name>Laure Joncour</a10:name></a10:author><category>Blog post</category><category>Artificial intelligence</category><title>Artificial Intelligence at work: Legal issues in French labour law</title><description>Artificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly present in our professional lives—whether in recruitment, human resources management, task automation or decision-making. Employees use AI to enhance their efficiency or to assist with repetitive tasks, often without informing their managers.</description><pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2025 15:06:58 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Laure Joncour</dc:creator></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{E3F44452-8352-4F9E-BB9C-CE369B98F5EA}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2025/08/explain-yourself-the-legal-requirements-governing-explainability</link><a10:author><a10:name>Marcus Evans</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Rosie Nance</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Lily Hands</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Lisa Fitzgerald</a10:name></a10:author><category>Artificial intelligence</category><category>Tech regulation insights</category><category>Blog post</category><title>Explain yourself: The legal requirements governing explainability</title><description>&lt;br/&gt;Agentic AI brings the promise of AI making a range of decisions autonomously. It has been proposed as the way forward for some of the most impactful decisions in our lives: interacting with customers and actioning requests, triaging requests for medical appointments, and hiring candidates — to name a few.&lt;br/&gt;</description><pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2025 11:31:57 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marcus Evans, Rosie Nance, Lily Hands, Lisa Fitzgerald</dc:creator></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{80115C10-9012-40EF-A001-9663E9FC99D5}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2025/08/integrating-artificial-intelligence-in-ma-processes-a-new-strategic-era-part-1-leveraging-ai</link><a10:author><a10:name>Jérémie Wyatt</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Imran Ahmad</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Domenic Presta</a10:name></a10:author><category>Artificial intelligence</category><category>Blog post</category><title>Integrating artificial intelligence in M&amp;A processes: A new strategic era – Part 1: Leveraging AI and its advantages</title><description>Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming established practices in multiple areas across all industries, and mergers and acquisitions (M&amp;A) are not immune to this transformation. From the exploratory phase to due diligence, including contract drafting and negotiations, AI enables M&amp;A teams to leverage powerful tools for analysis, automation, and prediction, thus improving efficiency, accuracy, and objectivity. </description><pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2025 10:26:29 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jérémie Wyatt, Imran Ahmad, Domenic Presta</dc:creator></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{48F055CD-B969-47EA-8081-34DF76CA9B14}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2025/08/technology-contracts-in-the-adgm-new-requirements-under-the-cyber-risk-management-framework</link><a10:author><a10:name>Shabnam Karim</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Kerri Gevers</a10:name></a10:author><category>Blog post</category><category>Technology</category><title>Technology contracts in the ADGM: New requirements under the Cyber Risk Management Framework</title><description>Regulated financial services sector firms in the Abu Dhabi Global Market  (ADGM) have six months to comply with the new Cyber Risk Management Framework announced by the  Financial Services Regulatory Authority (FSRA) on 29 July 2025.</description><pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2025 15:27:56 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shabnam Karim, Kerri Gevers</dc:creator></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{E13B8F25-6695-4233-AD6A-900AC2DD4ED0}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2025/08/cyber-risk-management-in-the-adgm-an-analysis-of-the-new-regulatory-framework</link><a10:author><a10:name>Shabnam Karim</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Kerri Gevers</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Simon Lamb</a10:name></a10:author><category>Blog post</category><category>Technology</category><title>Cyber risk management in the ADGM: an analysis of the new regulatory framework</title><description>On 29 July 2025, the Financial Services Regulatory Authority (FSRA) of the Abu Dhabi Global Market (ADGM) announced the implementation of a new Cyber Risk Management Framework that will apply to financial sector firms under its supervision.</description><pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2025 15:09:48 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shabnam Karim, Kerri Gevers, Simon Lamb</dc:creator></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{9DF150ED-691F-474F-AB40-8746EF375C35}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2025/08/eu-design-law-reform-implications-for-businesses</link><a10:author><a10:name>Ronak Kalhor-Witzel</a10:name></a10:author><category>Intellectual property</category><category>Blog post</category><title>EU design law reform: Implications for businesses</title><description>On 1 May 2025, the first phase of reform of European design law entered into force. Regulation (EU) 2024/2822 and Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/73 together, as phase I, form part of a broader modernisation initiative (the so-called “Designs and Models Package”) being implemented in two phases. </description><pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2025 09:35:57 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ronak Kalhor-Witzel</dc:creator></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{EABCE6F1-99C9-4DEA-809F-6C05BF351ED6}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2025/08/german-federal-court-refers-ad-blocker-case-back-to-hamburg-higher-regional-court</link><a10:author><a10:name>Ronak Kalhor-Witzel</a10:name></a10:author><category>Intellectual property</category><category>Blog post</category><title>German Federal Court refers ad blocker case back to Hamburg Higher Regional Court</title><description>On 31 July 2025, the German Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof, BGH) issued its decision (decision of 31 July 2025 - I ZR 131/23) in the long-running dispute between Axel Springer and Eyeo (Adblock Plus), referring the case back to the Higher Regional Court of Hamburg for further examination. (Our previous blog, Germany: Copyright and ad blockers, summarises the earlier stages of this litigation.) </description><pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2025 09:20:54 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ronak Kalhor-Witzel</dc:creator></item></channel></rss>