<rss xmlns:a10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Australia</title><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/rss/australia</link><description>Recent blog posts</description><language>en</language><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{FD4B3D68-EF08-461C-904E-3B3E57D9A870}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2026/03/data-centres-and-ai-infrastructure-expectations-for-australian-developers</link><a10:author><a10:name>Ka-Chi Cheung</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Peter Mulligan</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Lisa Fitzgerald</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Michael Muratore</a10:name></a10:author><category>Artificial intelligence</category><category>Australia</category><category>Data</category><category>Tech regulation insights</category><category>Blog post</category><title>Data centres and AI infrastructure: Expectations for Australian developers</title><description>The Australian Government will prioritise proposals based on national interest, the energy transition, water usage, workforce development, and research and innovation.</description><pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2026 13:08:52 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ka-Chi Cheung, Peter Mulligan, Lisa Fitzgerald, Michael Muratore</dc:creator></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{CCCB114C-4884-45BC-A4F9-719E4D232902}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2026/03/ai-algorithms-and-automation-in-the-workplace-new-south-wales-digital-work-systems-bill</link><a10:author><a10:name>Katherine Morris</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Nicki Milionis</a10:name></a10:author><category>Tech regulation insights</category><category>Australia</category><category>Employment</category><title>AI, algorithms and automation in the workplace: New South Wales’ Digital Work Systems Bill</title><description>The Parliament of New South Wales has passed a Bill introducing Australia’s first reforms of their kind to the Work Health and Safety framework. This article explores the key reforms and what they mean for organisations using digital tools to allocate, monitor or assess work.</description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2026 15:19:45 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Katherine Morris, Nicki Milionis</dc:creator></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{20A76D6B-4C2A-4903-AF3D-8AF31183E937}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2026/03/regulating-ai-in-australian-financial-services-practical-guidance-for-compliance</link><a10:author><a10:name>Lisa Fitzgerald</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Peter Mulligan</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Ka-Chi Cheung</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Bernard O'Shea</a10:name></a10:author><category>Artificial intelligence</category><category>Australia</category><category>Data protection</category><category>Financial institutions</category><category>Financial institutions</category><category>Blog post</category><title>Regulating AI in Australian financial services: Practical guidance for compliance</title><description>This article examines how Australian financial regulators approach artificial intelligence, summarising key guidance from ASIC, APRA, OAIC and AUSTRAC and setting out practical compliance considerations for firms, boards and executives.</description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2026 14:02:18 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lisa Fitzgerald, Peter Mulligan, Ka-Chi Cheung, Bernard O'Shea</dc:creator></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{41C4A534-45E7-4224-B9ED-1F07964E916E}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2022/05/demise-of-the-machines-australia-overturns-ruling-on-artificial-intelligence-as-a-patent-inventor</link><a10:author><a10:name>Jackie O'Brien</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Isobel Taylor</a10:name></a10:author><category>Technology</category><category>Blog post</category><category>Artificial intelligence</category><category>Australia</category><category>Intellectual property</category><title>Demise of the machines: Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia overturns ruling on AI as a patent ‘inventor’</title><description>After a somewhat surprising victory in the Federal Court last year  (about which we wrote in our article ‘Rise of the Machines’), the hopes that an artificial intelligence machine, nicknamed DABUS, could be named as the inventor on a patent application have now been dashed by the Full Court.  In short, the Full Court upheld an appeal by the Commissioner, ultimately finding that Dr Thaler’s patent application had indeed lapsed for failure to name an ‘inventor’ as required by the relevant regulations. </description><pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2022 09:03:52 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jackie O'Brien, Isobel Taylor</dc:creator></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{5F736513-FBCB-42B4-B2E7-83DCB5EC347B}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2021/12/the-year-that-was-for-dabus-the-worlds-first-ai-inventor</link><a10:author><a10:name>Jackie O'Brien</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Isobel Taylor</a10:name></a10:author><category>Blog post</category><category>Intellectual property</category><category>Artificial intelligence</category><category>Australia</category><category>Technology</category><category>Unlocking IP</category><title>The year that was for DABUS, the world’s first AI ‘inventor’</title><description>While many of us (in Australia at least), have spent the better part of the last two years locked down, sitting on the couch waiting out the COVID-19 pandemic, judges and patent examiners around the world have been busy grappling with questions ranging from the mundane (legislative interpretation) to the existential (what it means to be ‘a creator’ ).</description><pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2021 22:50:00 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jackie O'Brien, Isobel Taylor</dc:creator></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{133CFC77-DF75-451B-9C69-F86E0F9F8FA6}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2021/08/rise-of-the-machines-federal-court-of-australia-holds-that-artificial-intelligence</link><a10:author><a10:name>Jackie O'Brien</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Isobel Taylor</a10:name></a10:author><category>Artificial intelligence</category><category>Technology</category><category>Blog post</category><category>Australia</category><category>UK</category><title>Rise of the machines: Federal Court of Australia holds that artificial intelligence can be a patent ‘inventor’</title><description>This decision represents the first judicial step worldwide towards the recognition of AI machines as inventors of patents, and is significant as it may signal a divergence between Australian patent law on this issue and other jurisdictions who have recently taken a different approach, including the EU and the UK.</description><pubDate>Sun, 08 Aug 2021 04:42:00 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jackie O'Brien, Isobel Taylor</dc:creator></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{E3DE923A-C299-4FED-8911-E4F1BC87FB5A}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2021/01/2020-the-year-in-artificial-intelligence</link><category>Artificial intelligence</category><category>Australia</category><category>Technology</category><category>Publication</category><title>2020: The year in artificial intelligence</title><description>Australia is well placed to advance digital innovation and the embedding of artificial intelligence over the course of the recovery from the pandemic.</description><pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2021 12:17:54 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"></dc:creator></item></channel></rss>