<rss xmlns:a10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Data protection</title><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/rss/data-protection</link><description>Recent blog posts</description><language>en</language><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{62D1D8D2-89A2-4FBF-A5E3-8B89DCF638E6}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2026/05/revised-colorado-ai-law-signed-by-governor</link><a10:author><a10:name>Marc B. Collier</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Helen Christakos</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Susana Medeiros</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Ethan Glenn</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Remi Gambino</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Shushan Gabrielyan</a10:name></a10:author><category>Artificial intelligence</category><category>Data protection</category><category>Regulation</category><category>Financial institutions</category><category>Life sciences and healthcare</category><category>Technology</category><category>Blog post</category><title>Revised Colorado AI law signed by Governor</title><description>Colorado just rewrote its own AI regulation, affecting every company developing or deploying AI in a way that may touch a Colorado resident.</description><pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 18:27:00 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marc B. Collier, Helen Christakos, Susana Medeiros, Ethan Glenn, Remi Gambino, Shushan Gabrielyan</dc:creator></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{45714B94-F6B3-45BA-846E-D66BCCE6E0B9}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2026/04/using-ai-in-healthcare-helping-to-stay-hipaa-compliant</link><a10:author><a10:name>Jeff Wurzburg</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Susana Medeiros</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Susan Linda Ross</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Abel Chacko</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Kathleen Rubinstein</a10:name></a10:author><category>Blog post</category><category>Artificial intelligence</category><category>Data protection</category><category>Life sciences and healthcare</category><title>Using AI in healthcare: Helping to Stay HIPAA compliant</title><description>Healthcare providers are rapidly adopting AI for clinical and operational uses, often involving protected health information that is governed by HIPAA’s Privacy Rule.</description><pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 19:29:00 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jeff Wurzburg, Susana Medeiros, Susan Linda Ross, Abel Chacko, Kathleen Rubinstein</dc:creator></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{20A76D6B-4C2A-4903-AF3D-8AF31183E937}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2026/03/regulating-ai-in-australian-financial-services-practical-guidance-for-compliance</link><a10:author><a10:name>Lisa Fitzgerald</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Peter Mulligan</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Ka-Chi Cheung</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Bernard O'Shea</a10:name></a10:author><category>Artificial intelligence</category><category>Australia</category><category>Data protection</category><category>Financial institutions</category><category>Financial institutions</category><category>Blog post</category><title>Regulating AI in Australian financial services: Practical guidance for compliance</title><description>This article examines how Australian financial regulators approach artificial intelligence, summarising key guidance from ASIC, APRA, OAIC and AUSTRAC and setting out practical compliance considerations for firms, boards and executives.</description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2026 14:02:18 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lisa Fitzgerald, Peter Mulligan, Ka-Chi Cheung, Bernard O'Shea</dc:creator></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{7011D4E2-0D5D-4E5E-A352-8E8593E6F739}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2026/03/privilege-challenges-in-the-era-of-generative-ai</link><a10:author><a10:name>Ellen Blanchard</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Marc B. Collier</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Susana Medeiros</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Ethan Glenn</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Susan Linda Ross</a10:name></a10:author><category>Artificial intelligence</category><category>Data protection</category><category>Regulation</category><category>Technology</category><category>Blog post</category><title>Privilege challenges in the era of generative AI</title><description>Generative AI is quickly becoming part of everyday legal work, but recent court decisions show it can also create real risks for attorney client privilege.</description><pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2026 15:33:00 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ellen Blanchard, Marc B. Collier, Susana Medeiros, Ethan Glenn, Susan Linda Ross</dc:creator></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{7CCD259F-5358-4340-9435-E8ACB8C5EA82}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2025/11/video-gaming-navigating-cybersecurity-legal-and-technological-challenges</link><a10:author><a10:name>Jasper Geerdes</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Jurriaan Jansen</a10:name></a10:author><category>Data protection</category><category>Technology</category><category>Blog post</category><title>Video gaming: Navigating cybersecurity legal and technological challenges </title><description>The video gaming industry is an alluring target for cyber criminals.  In response, regulators in various jurisdictions have sought to bring video gaming into scope of critical infrastructure legislation or have adopted sector-specific rules.</description><pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2025 14:07:17 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jasper Geerdes, Jurriaan Jansen</dc:creator></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{FBD2D73C-D1F6-415A-B41D-AB961FE53922}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2025/07/do-your-technology-and-outsourcing-contracts-properly-address-liability-for-cyber-incidents</link><a10:author><a10:name>James Russell</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Kerri Gevers</a10:name></a10:author><category>Data protection</category><category>Financial institutions</category><category>Liability</category><category>Regulation</category><category>Blog post</category><title>Do your technology and outsourcing contracts properly address liability for cyber incidents?</title><description>Most incidents handled by our Norton Rose Fulbright cyber team originate from the customer’s service provider. In many cases it is the service provider’s systems, infrastructure and environment which proves to be the most vulnerable to cyber breaches and security issues.</description><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2025 14:48:34 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">James Russell, Kerri Gevers</dc:creator></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{48D6EDB2-1A84-4D9F-8A8D-D0E372EC8405}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2025/05/navigating-regulatory-challenges-in-data-centres</link><category>Data</category><category>Data protection</category><category>Regulation</category><category>Tech regulation insights</category><title>Navigating regulatory challenges in data centres</title><description>Businesses investing in, financing or operating data centres face a complex matrix of laws and regulatory requirements. Ensuring compliance is important for lender and investor due diligence and is crucial to avoiding fines, penalties and contractual or regulatory breaches that can significantly impact the business and any investment in, or financing of, data centres. </description><pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2025 13:59:34 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"></dc:creator></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{80C85DDD-96A8-43CF-98BA-28841B515DFD}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2024/07/12th-annual-european-data-protection-conference</link><a10:author><a10:name>Marcus Evans</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Christoph Ritzer</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Jurriaan Jansen</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Nadège Martin</a10:name></a10:author><category>Data protection</category><category>Blog post</category><title>12th Annual European Data Protection Conference</title><description>Please join us at our 12th Annual European Data Protection Conference.</description><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2024 12:16:57 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marcus Evans, Christoph Ritzer, Jurriaan Jansen, Nadège Martin</dc:creator></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{06124A92-7790-4619-BB58-3DAF12FBC7EE}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2024/02/singapore-proposes-governance-framework-for-generative-ai</link><a10:author><a10:name>Marcus Evans</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Wilson Ang</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Jeremy Lua</a10:name></a10:author><category>Artificial intelligence</category><category>Data protection</category><title>Singapore proposes Governance Framework for Generative AI</title><description>On 16 January 2023, Singapore’s Infocomm Media Development Authority (IMDA), in collaboration with the AI Verify Foundation, announced a public consultation on its draft Model AI Governance Framework for Generative AI (Draft GenAI Governance Framework), showing the areas where future policy interventions relating to generative AI may take place and options for such intervention.</description><pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2024 16:47:00 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marcus Evans, Wilson Ang, Jeremy Lua</dc:creator></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{C1B117E9-F631-465F-B80A-0121A5CDDCA3}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2023/10/uk-information-commissioners-office-publishes-final-guidance-on-employee-monitoring</link><category>Blog post</category><category>Data</category><category>Data protection</category><category>Employment</category><category>FinTech</category><title>UK Information Commissioner’s Office Publishes Final Guidance On Employee Monitoring</title><description>The UK Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) published its final guidance on monitoring workers on 3 October 2023 (the Guidance).</description><pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2023 14:59:00 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"></dc:creator></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{A37CB014-B418-4B67-961E-0B31A55A09C1}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2023/09/an-overview-of-the-european-digital-strategy</link><a10:author><a10:name>Polina Maloshchinskaia</a10:name></a10:author><category>Blog post</category><category>Data</category><category>Data protection</category><category>Regulation</category><category>Tech regulation insights</category><title>An overview of the European digital strategy</title><description>We have published an article, EU: An overview of the European digital strategy, explaining the aims and key components of the EU digital strategy, outlining at a high-level key legislation that has been published in this space in the past three years and highlighting the way in which the various legislative instruments interact with each other and with European data privacy rules.</description><pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2023 16:08:00 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Polina Maloshchinskaia</dc:creator></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{421642AE-055E-4E64-AA06-B12192585062}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2023/02/privilege-privacy-and-confidentiality</link><a10:author><a10:name>Farah Mukaddam</a10:name></a10:author><category>Intellectual property</category><category>Data protection</category><category>Blog post</category><category>Technology</category><title>Privilege, privacy and confidentiality; unlike confidentiality, reasonable expectation of privacy is not a precursor to privilege</title><description>The Commercial Court in Jinxin Inc v Aser Media Pte Ltd and others &amp; Others has ruled that an employer’s right to monitor and access private information of an employee held on its systems does not extend to a loss of confidentiality in those documents, and therefore a loss of privilege, as against the employer.  </description><pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2023 12:02:32 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Farah Mukaddam</dc:creator></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{F6326A1D-AE0D-4E39-828B-DFD6DE8738A3}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2022/12/ico-and-ofcom-joint-statement-on-online-safety-and-data-protection</link><a10:author><a10:name>Marcus Evans</a10:name></a10:author><category>Data protection</category><category>Data</category><category>UK</category><category>Blog post</category><title>The servant of two masters: ICO and OFCOM Joint Statement on Online Safety and Data Protection – coordination so service providers can comply with both</title><description>On 25 November 2022, the UK Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) and the Office of Communications (OFCOM) (together, the Regulators) released a joint statement setting out their shared views on the interactions between online safety and data protection (the Statement).</description><pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2022 09:49:19 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marcus Evans</dc:creator></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{4A158917-225D-406A-9A4A-91018F30D5F6}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2022/10/the-proposed-eu-cyber-resilience-act-what-it-is-and-how-it-may-impact-the-supply-chain</link><a10:author><a10:name>Polina Maloshchinskaia</a10:name></a10:author><category>Data</category><category>Data protection</category><category>FinTech</category><category>Internet of things</category><title>The proposed EU Cyber Resilience Act: what it is and how it may impact the supply chain</title><description>On 15 September 2022, the European Commission published its proposal for a new Regulation which sets out cybersecurity related requirements for products with “digital elements”, known as the proposed Cyber Resilience Act (the CRA). </description><pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2022 15:12:23 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Polina Maloshchinskaia</dc:creator></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{4347D207-2F43-4018-B6DB-70B6D85F4A5C}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2022/03/high-court-rejects-claim-blockchain-developers-owe-duties-to-users</link><a10:author><a10:name>Adam Sanitt</a10:name></a10:author><category>Data</category><category>Data protection</category><category>Technology</category><category>Blog post</category><category>Financial institutions</category><title>High Court rejects claim blockchain developers owe duties to users</title><description>The latest instalment in the Tulip Trading v Bitcoin Association litigation has been greeted with relief by many in the blockchain community, after the High Court threw out a claim that bitcoin developers (including several bitcoin forks) owed a duty of care or a fiduciary duty to an alleged owner of bitcoin. But the Court did not rule out duties being owed in other circumstances – distributed ledger technology developers, miners and users should all beware that the risk of unexpected liability has not been completely eliminated.</description><pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2022 15:10:00 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Adam Sanitt</dc:creator></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{C197C0E8-D661-4B5C-8132-CB7CD5D06690}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2022/03/copyright-protection-for-ai-created-work</link><a10:author><a10:name>Maya Medeiros</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>David Yi</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>William Chalmers</a10:name></a10:author><category>Intellectual property</category><category>Data protection</category><category>Technology</category><category>Blog post</category><category>Artificial intelligence</category><category>Technology in emea</category><title>Copyright protection for AI-created work?</title><description>Artificial intelligence (AI) systems are capable of creating a wide range of artistic, musical, and literary works and inventions without human involvement. These AI creations raise challenges to intellectual property (IP) frameworks. </description><pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2022 16:04:00 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Maya Medeiros, David Yi, William Chalmers</dc:creator></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{3BEC1DA1-85B9-43BE-A983-82C15E76EB46}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2022/02/facebook-data-scraping-claim-lacks-some-basis-in-fact</link><a10:author><a10:name>Randy Sutton</a10:name></a10:author><category>Data</category><category>Data protection</category><category>Technology</category><category>Blog post</category><title>Facebook data "scraping" claim lacks some basis in fact</title><description>The Supreme Court of British Columbia recently dismissed an attempt to certify a class action lawsuit against Facebook after the court found the plaintiffs failed to provide some “basis in fact” for their central allegation – that Facebook engaged in unauthorized data scraping.</description><pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2022 12:16:00 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Randy Sutton</dc:creator></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{ADAB6A0B-D60C-4A88-9141-EA4451B1BA4F}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2021/09/digital-transformation-key-technology-cybersecurity-and-privacy-risks</link><a10:author><a10:name>Imran Ahmad</a10:name></a10:author><category>Artificial intelligence</category><category>Canada</category><category>Data</category><category>Data protection</category><category>Regulation</category><category>Technology</category><category>Blog post</category><title>Digital transformation: Key technology, cybersecurity and privacy risks</title><description>In this blog we discuss the risks associated with digital transformation from technology, cybersecurity and privacy perspectives.</description><pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2021 08:19:48 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Imran Ahmad</dc:creator></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{7BC9E4F8-4944-4DDD-AAEA-3D5E84E66D64}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2021/07/eus-possible-data-act</link><a10:author><a10:name>Jay Modrall</a10:name></a10:author><category>Data protection</category><category>Regulation</category><category>Technology</category><category>Blog post</category><title>EU’s possible Data Act</title><description>Response to to the Consultation and Inception Impact Assessment are bound to shape the future of EU’s digital economy.</description><pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2021 11:53:06 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jay Modrall</dc:creator></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{2823138D-9FFE-4A6C-A851-AC94B2D54A24}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2021/06/max-schrems-ngo-noyb-submits-mass-cookie-law-compliance-complaints</link><category>Data protection</category><category>Technology</category><category>Blog post</category><title>Max Schrems’ NGO, noyb, submits mass cookie law compliance complaints</title><description>Max Schrems’ privacy NGO, noyb, submits hundreds of draft complaints to companies across the Europe about their cookie law compliance.</description><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2021 08:32:56 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"></dc:creator></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{E0A07E41-53EE-4206-83C3-41A724459FE6}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2021/06/mobile-data-in-investigations</link><a10:author><a10:name>Andrew Reeves</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Claudia Van Gruisen</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>David Harris</a10:name></a10:author><category>Data protection</category><category>Technology</category><category>Blog post</category><title>Top practical tips on the preservation, collection and review of mobile data in investigations</title><description>In this blog we outline practical tips for the preservation, collection and review of mobile data in investigations, which has become particularly important as remote working has accelerated the merger of work and private data.</description><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2021 13:49:18 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Reeves, Claudia Van Gruisen, David Harris</dc:creator></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{78689AF3-4960-45B4-B842-F779E6684AED}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2021/05/technology-joint-ventures-partnering-for-the-future</link><a10:author><a10:name>Jill Gauntlett</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Victoria Birch</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Mike Knapper</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Dominic Stuttaford</a10:name></a10:author><category>Antitrust and competition</category><category>Corporate</category><category>Data protection</category><category>Intellectual property</category><category>Regulation</category><category>Tax</category><category>UK</category><category>Technology</category><category>Blog post</category><title>Technology joint ventures: Partnering for the future</title><description>This article examines the key aspects of joint ventures in the technology sector and the particular issues and challenges that these joint ventures raise.</description><pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2021 13:04:00 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jill Gauntlett, Victoria Birch, Mike Knapper, Dominic Stuttaford</dc:creator></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{589C0D02-9297-4918-A60E-B6F67C0F7359}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2021/05/think-before-you-app</link><a10:author><a10:name>Daniel Daniele</a10:name></a10:author><category>Data protection</category><category>Technology</category><category>Blog post</category><title>Think Before You App</title><description>As we increase our app use we need to think about the risks to privacy.</description><pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2021 09:00:00 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daniel Daniele</dc:creator></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{22D00A3D-F5C8-4960-A600-4A7CDF091728}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2021/03/privacy-commissioners-take-position-on-using-facial-recognition-technology</link><a10:author><a10:name>Imran Ahmad</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Sara A. Levine, KC</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Alexis Kerr</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>John Cassell</a10:name></a10:author><category>Data protection</category><category>Technology</category><category>Blog post</category><title>Privacy commissioners take position on using facial recognition technology</title><description>In a joint investigation report, the Privacy Commissioner of Canada, together with the commissioners of BC, Alberta, and Quebec concluded that Clearview AI violated Canadians’ privacy rights under federal and provincial privacy laws by scraping billons of images of people available online to be continually used in what amounted to a virtual “police lineup.” </description><pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2021 17:11:23 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Imran Ahmad, Sara A. Levine, KC, Alexis Kerr, John Cassell</dc:creator></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{BD819147-F4AB-4F33-BF66-902884D0F25E}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2021/03/proposals-for-the-eprivacy-regulation-a-telecommunications-focus</link><a10:author><a10:name>Oliver Stacey</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Mark Maurice</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Fiona Bundy-Clarke</a10:name></a10:author><category>Data protection</category><category>Data</category><category>Regulation</category><category>Technology</category><category>Blog post</category><title>Proposals for the ePrivacy Regulation: A telecommunications focus</title><description>We consider some relevant areas of interest of the recently agreed position on the ePrivacy Regulation for telecommunications companies.</description><pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2021 14:48:32 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Oliver Stacey, Mark Maurice, Fiona Bundy-Clarke</dc:creator></item></channel></rss>