<rss xmlns:a10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>February 2023</title><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/rss/february-2023</link><description>Recent blog posts</description><language>en</language><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{164A8BC3-0875-411D-B32C-8A14C5A6F512}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2023/02/beware-sole-and-exclusive-remedies-clauses-when-seeking-to-terminate-a-contract</link><a10:author><a10:name>Kelsey Oosthuizen</a10:name></a10:author><category>Blog post</category><category>Liability</category><title>Beware sole and exclusive remedies clauses when seeking to terminate a contract</title><description>The recent case of James Kemball Ltd v. "K" Line (Europe) Ltd [2022] EWHC 2239 (Comm) serves as a useful reminder to give careful consideration to the effect of so-called “sole and exclusive remedies” clauses contained in contracts before purporting to terminate them.</description><pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2023 12:02:00 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kelsey Oosthuizen</dc:creator></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{E824D5DA-10A7-41F9-AD79-307257FEE1A3}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2023/02/hermes-succeeds-in-enforcing-trade-mark-rights-in-nft-dispute</link><a10:author><a10:name>Felicia J. Boyd</a10:name></a10:author><category>Blog post</category><category>Technology</category><category>Metaverse and NFTs</category><category>NFTs insights</category><title>Hermès succeeds in enforcing trade mark rights in NFT dispute </title><description>On February 8, 2023, a jury found Rothschild liable for trademark infringement, trademark dilution and cybersquatting based on Rothschild’s use of the Birkin mark to promote and sell the MetaBirkins NFTs. &lt;br/&gt;</description><pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2023 16:41:45 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Felicia J. Boyd</dc:creator></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{421642AE-055E-4E64-AA06-B12192585062}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2023/02/privilege-privacy-and-confidentiality</link><a10:author><a10:name>Farah Mukaddam</a10:name></a10:author><category>Intellectual property</category><category>Data protection</category><category>Blog post</category><category>Technology</category><title>Privilege, privacy and confidentiality; unlike confidentiality, reasonable expectation of privacy is not a precursor to privilege</title><description>The Commercial Court in Jinxin Inc v Aser Media Pte Ltd and others &amp; Others has ruled that an employer’s right to monitor and access private information of an employee held on its systems does not extend to a loss of confidentiality in those documents, and therefore a loss of privilege, as against the employer.  </description><pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2023 12:02:32 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Farah Mukaddam</dc:creator></item></channel></rss>