<rss xmlns:a10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>January 2022</title><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/rss/january-2022</link><description>Recent blog posts</description><language>en</language><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{F1AC5501-98AC-42BE-83F6-28426E604400}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2022/01/privacy-in-a-parallel-digital-universe-the-metaverse</link><a10:author><a10:name>Imran Ahmad</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Tiana Corovic</a10:name></a10:author><category>Technology</category><category>Blog post</category><category>Data</category><category>Metaverse and NFTs</category><category>Metaverse insights</category><category>Featured articles</category><title>Privacy in a parallel digital universe: The Metaverse</title><description>For many years, the immersive three-dimensional digital world has been left to the cinematic experience. However, the emergence of the metaverse presents an opportunity to translate everyday activities – working, attending a concert, travelling, shopping, socializing – into a parallel digital universe.</description><pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2022 12:22:00 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Imran Ahmad, Tiana Corovic</dc:creator></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{B4A56CC8-5E7A-46E6-AD80-605943789BB6}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2022/01/meta-cracking-the-door-open-for-data-related-class-actions</link><a10:author><a10:name>Emilia Radley</a10:name></a10:author><category>Data</category><category>Technology</category><category>Blog post</category><title>Meta: Cracking the door open for data-related class actions?</title><description>The announcement on 14 January 2022 of a proposed competition collective action against Meta (formerly Facebook) is the latest in a number of collective actions against the tech giants, including Apple and Google, and is of particular interest owing to the subject matter – namely data collection practices.  </description><pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2022 17:17:00 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Emilia Radley</dc:creator></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{D9868BD2-E25A-4128-B8F0-D7B9818854B2}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2022/01/open-source-software-licence-obligations</link><a10:author><a10:name>Brian Chau</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Maya Medeiros</a10:name></a10:author><category>Technology</category><category>Blog post</category><category>Intellectual property</category><title>Open source software licence obligations: Potential pitfalls for proprietary trained neural networks</title><description>Open source software and components can provide useful building blocks to reduce development time and effort.  In particular, certain open source software and components are made available for use under open source licences with “copyleft” requirements designed to enable downstream users to, among others, make changes to the software, obtain and modify source code of derivative works, and redistribute copies of the software or modified versions of the software.  </description><pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2022 16:50:19 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brian Chau, Maya Medeiros</dc:creator></item></channel></rss>