<rss xmlns:a10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>July 2024</title><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/rss/july-2024</link><description>Recent blog posts</description><language>en</language><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{80C85DDD-96A8-43CF-98BA-28841B515DFD}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2024/07/12th-annual-european-data-protection-conference</link><a10:author><a10:name>Marcus Evans</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Christoph Ritzer</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Jurriaan Jansen</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Nadège Martin</a10:name></a10:author><category>Data protection</category><category>Blog post</category><title>12th Annual European Data Protection Conference</title><description>Please join us at our 12th Annual European Data Protection Conference.</description><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2024 12:16:57 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marcus Evans, Christoph Ritzer, Jurriaan Jansen, Nadège Martin</dc:creator></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{2D9A9014-DBF9-4E67-975C-B5BA0E0F480B}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2024/07/germany-ai-cannot-be-named-as-inventor-insights-from-the-bundesgerichtshofs-dabus-decision</link><a10:author><a10:name>Ronak Kalhor-Witzel</a10:name></a10:author><category>Artificial intelligence</category><category>Blog post</category><title>Germany: AI cannot be named as inventor - insights from the Bundesgerichtshof’s DABUS decision</title><description>The Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof - BGH) in Germany recently issued a landmark ruling on the role of artificial intelligence (AI) in patent law. The decision, on 11 June 2024, in the DABUS case (AZ X ZB 5/22), reinforces the principle that only natural persons can be named as inventors under patent law. This ruling has significant implications for the future of AI-generated inventions and patent applications globally.</description><pubDate>Mon, 29 Jul 2024 09:44:00 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ronak Kalhor-Witzel</dc:creator></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{3E7FB672-F26E-4AFA-860C-D08AE6BF162A}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2024/07/artificial-intelligence-english-court-of-appeal-decides-artificial-neural-network-is-not-patentable</link><a10:author><a10:name>Polina Maloshchinskaia</a10:name></a10:author><category>Artificial intelligence</category><category>Blog post</category><title>Artificial intelligence: English Court of Appeal decides artificial neural network is not patentable</title><description>The English Court of Appeal has decided that an artificial neural network (ANN) was not patentable in Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks v Emotional Perception AI Ltd [2024] EWCA Civ 825 reversing the finding of the lower court (the High Court), and in so doing agreeing with the UK Intellectual Property Office’s (IPO) original rejection of the patent application on the basis of unpatentable subject matter.  The decision has ramifications for how patent claims for ANNs (and perhaps AI more generally) are made going forward, clarifying that training of an AI system that helps create the AI system itself, and non-technical outputs it produces, are not relevant in establishing patentability in relation to an AI computer program.</description><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2024 14:14:00 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Polina Maloshchinskaia</dc:creator></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{8D756964-6EF3-4AF9-8C89-B05AFACD91EE}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2024/07/chatbot-data-for-ai-improvement-leads-to-wiretapping-lawsuit</link><a10:author><a10:name>Susan Linda Ross</a10:name></a10:author><category>Artificial intelligence</category><category>Blog post</category><title>Chatbot data for AI improvement leads to wiretapping lawsuit</title><description>On July 5, 2024, a federal trial court judge ruled that a class action plaintiff’s claim against Peloton for aiding and abetting wiretapping survived a 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss.  </description><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2024 12:00:00 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Susan Linda Ross</dc:creator></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{2DF025FE-1C94-4EE6-86C9-EBC462579F72}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2024/07/beyond-the-fine-print</link><a10:author><a10:name>James Russell</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Kerri Gevers</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Rohan Isaacs</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Kelsey Oosthuizen</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Nick Jens</a10:name></a10:author><category>Technology</category><category>Blog post</category><title>Liability and indemnification in outsourcing, technology and transitional services agreements</title><description>How can you ensure risk allocation appropriately meets your needs as a business? What liability caps should be subject to exceptions? Do the indemnities reallocate risk in the way you intend?  </description><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2024 09:53:00 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">James Russell, Kerri Gevers, Rohan Isaacs, Kelsey Oosthuizen, Nick Jens</dc:creator></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{F39F4A54-3784-414F-908B-2FA1182B4739}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2024/07/the-eu-ai-act-the-countdown-begins</link><a10:author><a10:name>Rosie Nance</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Marcus Evans</a10:name></a10:author><category>Artificial intelligence</category><category>Blog post</category><title>The EU AI Act: The countdown begins</title><description>The EU AI Act was entered into the EU’s statute books on July 12, 2024. A transition period will begin from 1 August when it enters into force. The geographic scope is very broad, with obligations falling on organisations using or involved in the supply of AI in the EU and organisations operating outside the EU where the AI’s output is used in the EU.</description><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2024 08:36:00 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rosie Nance, Marcus Evans</dc:creator></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{062061C2-8AF5-4561-BD1E-53C0ABBBB96E}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2024/05/generative-ai</link><a10:author><a10:name>Jonathan Ball</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Felicia J. Boyd</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Justin Davidson</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Georgina Hey</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Jurriaan Jansen</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Mike Knapper</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>刘建强</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Maya Medeiros</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Clemens Rübel</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Jasper Geerdes</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Ronak Kalhor-Witzel</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Clement Monnet</a10:name></a10:author><category>Artificial intelligence</category><category>Blog post</category><title>Generative AI: A Global guide to key IP considerations</title><description>Artificial intelligence (AI) raises many intellectual property (IP) issues. While there are many AI models and use cases, this guide addresses key IP issues raised by generative AI systems, meaning systems such as ChatGPT, Bard and DALl-E with algorithms that generate new content (which, depending on the system may be text, audio, images, video code or other content).</description><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2024 12:44:00 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jonathan Ball, Felicia J. Boyd, Justin Davidson, Georgina Hey, Jurriaan Jansen, Mike Knapper, 刘建强, Maya Medeiros, Clemens Rübel, Jasper Geerdes, Ronak Kalhor-Witzel, Clement Monnet</dc:creator></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{44CD3BD2-04A8-4132-B640-AACDEEE3AE92}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2024/07/how-your-vendors-are-exploiting-your-data-for-their-own-gain</link><a10:author><a10:name>Michelle Meiselman</a10:name></a10:author><category>Artificial intelligence</category><title>How your vendors are exploiting your data for their own gain</title><description>Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming the way businesses operate and interact with their customers.</description><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2024 09:24:58 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michelle Meiselman</dc:creator></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{3F90C912-FD1F-4846-988B-79C9CB4F4847}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2024/06/artificial-intelligence-and-liability</link><category>Blog post</category><category>Technology</category><title>Artificial intelligence and liability: Key takeaways from recent EU legislative initiatives</title><description>The EU’s Artificial Intelligence Regulation, commonly referred to as the AI Act, is expected to come into force during the summer of 2024 (the AI Act). </description><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2024 09:19:00 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"></dc:creator></item></channel></rss>