<rss xmlns:a10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>July 2026</title><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/rss/july-2026</link><description>Recent blog posts</description><language>en</language><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{4257AE57-0E05-429E-9C5B-F3C78857A800}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2026/07/australian-government-targets-ai-infrastructure-and-training-inputs</link><a10:author><a10:name>Martyn Taylor</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Peter Mulligan</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Ka-Chi Cheung</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Dietrich Marquardt</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Lisa Fitzgerald</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Rohan Sridhar</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Amanda Wescombe</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Jim Lennon</a10:name></a10:author><category>Australia</category><category>Artificial intelligence</category><category>Blog post</category><title>Australian government targets AI infrastructure and training inputs</title><description>The Australian government seeks to develop AI rules for data centres, model training and copyright, while continuing to attract investment in AI capability.</description><pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2026 15:14:26 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Martyn Taylor, Peter Mulligan, Ka-Chi Cheung, Dietrich Marquardt, Lisa Fitzgerald, Rohan Sridhar, Amanda Wescombe, Jim Lennon</dc:creator></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{93CC2295-FC93-46FB-8C5B-C50A5C723B49}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2026/07/cyber-risk-in-the-quantum-era</link><a10:author><a10:name>Alexander McGuire</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Verity Quartermain</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Jonathan Ball</a10:name></a10:author><category>Blog post</category><category>Tech regulation insights</category><category>Data protection</category><title>Cyber risk in the quantum era</title><description>On 16 June 2026, the UK government announced the new “National Quantum Standards Network”, a world-first national framework for quantum standards to coordinate standards for quantum technologies. </description><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 10:44:47 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alexander McGuire, Verity Quartermain, Jonathan Ball</dc:creator></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{AC899ACD-5194-4CC3-98F0-F5C577623CF2}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2026/07/ai-in-litigation-ny-state-court-weighs-in-on-genai-privilege</link><a10:author><a10:name>Marc B. Collier</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Susana Medeiros</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Ethan Glenn</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Marissa Elder</a10:name></a10:author><category>Blog post</category><category>Artificial intelligence</category><category>Data protection</category><category>Technology</category><category>Regulation</category><title>AI in litigation: NY State Court weighs in on GenAI privilege</title><description>Norton Rose Fulbright has been closely monitoring a growing body of decisions released in 2026, that address whether generative artificial intelligence prompts and outputs are entitled to privilege protections. </description><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 21:37:00 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marc B. Collier, Susana Medeiros, Ethan Glenn, Marissa Elder</dc:creator></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{5F62FE0B-80FA-44E8-8834-EB9761335759}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2026/07/ai-appreciation-day-2026-and-the-evolving-regulatory-landscape</link><a10:author><a10:name>David Kessler</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Andrea L. D'Ambra</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Chuck Hollis</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Ellen Blanchard</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Susana Medeiros</a10:name></a10:author><category>Blog post</category><category>Artificial intelligence</category><category>Technology</category><title>AI Appreciation Day 2026 and the evolving regulatory landscape</title><description>AI Appreciation Day 2026 provides a timely lens on how artificial intelligence is moving into an era of accountable adoption. </description><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 14:02:00 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Kessler, Andrea L. D'Ambra, Chuck Hollis, Ellen Blanchard, Susana Medeiros</dc:creator></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{A256C1CE-59AB-4FC7-A126-42306C4CCD90}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2026/07/what-you-need-to-know-about-illinois-artificial-intelligence-safety-measures-act</link><a10:author><a10:name>Marc B. Collier</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Helen Christakos</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Ethan Glenn</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Charlotte Swart</a10:name></a10:author><category>Blog post</category><category>Artificial intelligence</category><category>Technology</category><title>What you need to know about Illinois’s Artificial Intelligence Safety Measures Act</title><description>While the Act incorporates concepts appearing in other recently enacted state AI laws, it also introduces a new requirement of mandatory independent third-party audits of covered AI systems. </description><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 19:05:00 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marc B. Collier, Helen Christakos, Ethan Glenn, Charlotte Swart</dc:creator></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{ECE78768-22A7-4E51-B96C-8EFDEFBBE9F0}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2026/07/generative-ai-and-expert-witnesses-are-the-rules-clear-enough</link><a10:author><a10:name>Andrew Judkins</a10:name></a10:author><category>Artificial intelligence</category><category>Blog post</category><title>Generative AI and expert witnesses: Are the rules clear enough?</title><description>This briefing considers whether existing rules concerning expert evidence in English court proceedings are sufficient to mitigate AI-related risks.</description><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2026 14:28:56 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Judkins</dc:creator></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{290B8512-AA23-4A20-9C52-E617F7458D2F}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2026/07/the-upcs-jurisdiction-may-be-expanding-faster-than-its-geographic-footprint</link><a10:author><a10:name>Clemens Rübel</a10:name></a10:author><category>Blog post</category><category>Intellectual property</category><title>The UPC’s jurisdiction may be expanding faster than its geographic footprint </title><description>In a landmark ruling in Fujifilm v. Kodak, the UPC Court of Appeal confirmed that it can adjudicate patent infringement claims relating to national designations of European patents outside the UPC system, including the United Kingdom. While the Court ultimately overturned the infringement finding, its broader message is difficult to miss: the UPC is positioning itself as a forum capable of resolving increasingly international technology disputes. </description><pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2026 14:42:00 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Clemens Rübel</dc:creator></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{57CB134D-BA7B-4D60-A9F4-0A2FB21F22FC}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2026/06/ai-in-litigation-florida-sues-openai-over-chatgpt-safety-concerns</link><a10:author><a10:name>Marc B. Collier</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Ethan Glenn</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Marissa Elder</a10:name></a10:author><category>Blog post</category><category>Artificial intelligence</category><category>Data protection</category><category>Technology</category><category>Regulation</category><title>AI in litigation: Florida sues OpenAI over ChatGPT safety concerns</title><description>On June 1, 2026, the Florida Office of the Attorney General, State of Florida and the Florida Department of Legal Affairs, sued OpenAI and its CEO Sam Altman, accusing the company of ignoring safety warnings and releasing ChatGPT while knowing it was harmful to users.</description><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2026 13:25:00 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marc B. Collier, Ethan Glenn, Marissa Elder</dc:creator></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{C3E64E62-A38E-4B39-8BE9-823269532FE0}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2026/07/texas-business-court-addresses-privilege-issues-in-the-age-of-generative-ai</link><a10:author><a10:name>Andrew Price</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Marc B. Collier</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Susana Medeiros</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Ethan Glenn</a10:name></a10:author><category>Blog post</category><category>Artificial intelligence</category><category>Technology</category><category>Texas Business Court Insider - Insights</category><title>Texas Business Court addresses privilege issues in the age of generative AI</title><description>In a recent decision, the Texas Business Court held that AI chat logs created by a litigant may be protected by work-product privilege under Texas law and that disclosure of information to an AI platform does not automatically waive that protection.</description><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 18:51:00 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Price, Marc B. Collier, Susana Medeiros, Ethan Glenn</dc:creator></item></channel></rss>