<rss xmlns:a10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>May 2026</title><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/rss/may-2026</link><description>Recent blog posts</description><language>en</language><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{6EC0559D-CF1F-424D-B46F-424F909CEBBD}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2026/05/artificial-intelligence-as-adversary-understanding-claude-mythos-and-the-road-ahead</link><a10:author><a10:name>Will Daugherty</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Ji Won Kim</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Remi Gambino</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Phillip Pang</a10:name></a10:author><category>Artificial intelligence</category><category>Financial institutions</category><category>Technology</category><category>Blog post</category><title>Artificial intelligence as adversary: Understanding Claude Mythos and the road ahead</title><description>On April 7, 2026, Anthropic disclosed that it had developed a model deemed too capable for unrestricted public release, Claude Mythos Preview, a development with substantial implications for the legal, compliance and cybersecurity sectors. </description><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 21:34:00 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Will Daugherty, Ji Won Kim, Remi Gambino, Phillip Pang</dc:creator></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{5316D19E-A1B8-41C3-9CDB-102C6D969343}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2026/05/eu-ai-act-the-eu-commissions-guidance-on-high-risk-ai</link><a10:author><a10:name>Rosie Nance</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Marcus Evans</a10:name></a10:author><category>Artificial intelligence</category><category>Regulation</category><title>EU AI Act: The EU Commission’s guidance on high-risk AI</title><description>The EU Commission recently published draft guidelines for the high-risk AI provisions under the EU AI Act.  These provide examples of use cases that fall under the AI system’s stringent rules for high-risk AI systems, and those that do not. </description><pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2026 19:08:16 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rosie Nance, Marcus Evans</dc:creator></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{02B50292-1CEF-4E8B-BA37-AD73C38E55E8}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2026/05/professional-licensing-and-ai-outputs-pennsylvanias-characterai-case</link><a10:author><a10:name>Ellen Blanchard</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Jeff Wurzburg</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Kathleen Rubinstein</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Ethan Glenn</a10:name></a10:author><category>Artificial intelligence</category><category>Regulation</category><category>Life sciences and healthcare</category><category>Technology</category><category>Blog post</category><title>Professional licensing and AI outputs: Pennsylvania's Character.AI case</title><description>A Pennsylvania state board has filed a groundbreaking lawsuit against the company behind Character.AI, alleging that an artificial intelligence chatbot's claims of psychiatric credentials and a Pennsylvania medical license constitute the unlicensed practice of medicine. </description><pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 14:47:00 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ellen Blanchard, Jeff Wurzburg, Kathleen Rubinstein, Ethan Glenn</dc:creator></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{62D1D8D2-89A2-4FBF-A5E3-8B89DCF638E6}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2026/05/revised-colorado-ai-law-signed-by-governor</link><a10:author><a10:name>Marc B. Collier</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Helen Christakos</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Susana Medeiros</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Ethan Glenn</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Remi Gambino</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Shushan Gabrielyan</a10:name></a10:author><category>Artificial intelligence</category><category>Data protection</category><category>Regulation</category><category>Financial institutions</category><category>Life sciences and healthcare</category><category>Technology</category><category>Blog post</category><title>Revised Colorado AI law signed by Governor</title><description>Colorado just rewrote its own AI regulation, affecting every company developing or deploying AI in a way that may touch a Colorado resident.</description><pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 18:27:00 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marc B. Collier, Helen Christakos, Susana Medeiros, Ethan Glenn, Remi Gambino, Shushan Gabrielyan</dc:creator></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{6F9C5675-9296-4B5B-A7C4-D820B176DD63}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2026/05/colorado-ai-act-enforcement-suspended-amid-x-ai-lawsuit-and-doj-intervention</link><a10:author><a10:name>Marc B. Collier</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Helen Christakos</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Ethan Glenn</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Remi Gambino</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Shushan Gabrielyan</a10:name></a10:author><category>Artificial intelligence</category><category>Regulation</category><category>Financial institutions</category><category>Life sciences and healthcare</category><category>Technology</category><category>Blog post</category><title>Colorado AI Act enforcement suspended amid X.AI lawsuit and DOJ intervention</title><description>Colorado's landmark AI act is officially on ice, and the legal fight behind that development is shaping the national conversation on AI regulation.</description><pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 14:47:00 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marc B. Collier, Helen Christakos, Ethan Glenn, Remi Gambino, Shushan Gabrielyan</dc:creator></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{8F8D76C7-BB16-47B9-A4B9-040E661B32DF}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2026/05/artificial-intelligence-and-outsourcing</link><a10:author><a10:name>Nick Jens</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Marcus Evans</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>James Russell</a10:name></a10:author><category>Artificial intelligence</category><category>Blog post</category><title>Artificial Intelligence and Outsourcing</title><description>Our outsourcing and AI lawyers consider whether various provisions in outsourcing contract are fit for purpose for an outsourcing that involves the use of AI.</description><pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 10:46:48 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nick Jens, Marcus Evans, James Russell</dc:creator></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{07D8EFA5-ABE5-4E5C-83C2-3D78632A289F}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2026/05/dubai-outsourcing-framework-for-public-services</link><a10:author><a10:name>Kerri Gevers</a10:name></a10:author><category>Tech regulation insights</category><category>Technology</category><category>Corporate</category><title>Dubai: Outsourcing framework for public services</title><description>Dubai Law No. 5/2026 on the Regulation of the Outsourcing of Government Services creates an outsourcing framework for public services that will be familiar to those operating in the financial services sector.  Here we explore how the new law compares to financial services sector outsourcing regimes, which elements are novel or enhance existing public procurement requirements, and what service providers to Dubai government entities should prepare themselves for.</description><pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 09:31:00 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kerri Gevers</dc:creator></item></channel></rss>