<rss xmlns:a10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>November 2024</title><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/rss/november-2024</link><description>Recent blog posts</description><language>en</language><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{F473036B-7894-4779-87C0-CAD477050029}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2024/11/revised-product-liability-directive-introducing-rules-on-strict-liability-for-ai-and-other-software</link><a10:author><a10:name>Marcus Evans</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Lucy Bruce Jones</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Rosie Nance</a10:name></a10:author><category>Artificial intelligence</category><category>Liability</category><category>Regulation</category><category>Blog post</category><title>Revised Product Liability Directive (introducing rules on strict liability for AI and other software) entered in the EU's statute book</title><description>Directive (EU) 2024/2853 on liability for defective products (the Revised Product Liability Directive) was published in the Official Journal of the European Union on 18 November 2024.</description><pubDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2024 14:19:39 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marcus Evans, Lucy Bruce Jones, Rosie Nance</dc:creator></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{3E7A659E-F2E7-4DDB-8339-BF23F91384D6}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2024/11/germany-copyright-and-ad-blockers</link><a10:author><a10:name>Ronak Kalhor-Witzel</a10:name></a10:author><category>Intellectual property</category><category>Blog post</category><title>Germany: Copyright and ad blockers</title><description>Does a browser plug-in that suppresses advertisements on websites (a so-called “ad blocker”) by manipulating browser-generated data structures constitute an unauthorised modification of a computer program, and so amount to an infringement of copyright under Germany copyright law?</description><pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2024 09:54:29 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ronak Kalhor-Witzel</dc:creator></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{0BF42C2B-8028-495E-AB58-6039C0E0C950}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2024/11/artificial-intelligence-deployment-in-company-secretarial-and-governance-functions</link><a10:author><a10:name>Sean Murphy</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Megan Skipper</a10:name></a10:author><category>Artificial intelligence</category><category>Corporate</category><category>Blog post</category><title>Artificial Intelligence: deployment in company secretarial and governance functions</title><description>The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI), including Generative AI, into company secretarial and governance tasks, such as recording or otherwise assisting with board meeting minutes, has the potential to enhance efficiency and productivity. </description><pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2024 16:12:35 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sean Murphy, Megan Skipper</dc:creator></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{673851AC-8FF6-4C36-8741-6CBD1E240885}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2024/11/skykick-v-sky-the-uk-supreme-courts-decision</link><a10:author><a10:name>Farah Mukaddam</a10:name></a10:author><category>Intellectual property</category><category>Blog post</category><title>Skykick v Sky: The UK Supreme Court's decision</title><description>The UK Supreme Court has handed down its hotly-anticipated trade mark decision in the Skykick v Sky case. The Supreme Court judgment was given notwithstanding that the parties having settled the dispute, indicating the significance of the points of law that were raised in the case.</description><pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2024 10:10:10 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Farah Mukaddam</dc:creator></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{BDA77021-B21E-44B2-AA40-76C3E2A35DC2}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2024/11/fca-invites-views-through-new-ai-input-zone</link><a10:author><a10:name>Simon Lovegrove</a10:name></a10:author><category>Artificial intelligence</category><category>Blog post</category><title>FCA invites views through new AI Input Zone</title><description>On 5 November 2024, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) opened its AI Input Zone, through which it is inviting stakeholders to provide their views on  current and future uses of artificial intelligence (AI) in UK financial services, as well as the financial services regulatory framework.</description><pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2024 15:31:17 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Simon Lovegrove</dc:creator></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{D9581A33-F94D-47FB-B6D9-9DEDEFDF2BA0}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2024/11/data-protection-using-ai-in-the-uk-where-are-we-now</link><a10:author><a10:name>Marcus Evans</a10:name></a10:author><category>Artificial intelligence</category><category>Blog post</category><title>Data protection: Using AI in the UK – where are we now?</title><description>This webinar will look at the legal risks to consider when developing and using AI in the UK in 2025, including considerations for generative AI tools. It will provide an update on UK AI policy and new laws proposed.  It will also look at existing cross-sectoral and sectoral laws and how they apply to AI, and the application of the EU AI Act to UK businesses.</description><pubDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2024 14:28:27 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marcus Evans</dc:creator></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{2EC43440-D723-4DF1-8548-618AB2CD3343}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2024/11/ai-adoption-in-australia-under-the-privacy-spotlight</link><a10:author><a10:name>Lisa Fitzgerald</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Bernard O'Shea</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Ka-Chi Cheung</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Peter Mulligan</a10:name></a10:author><category>Artificial intelligence</category><category>Blog post</category><title>AI adoption in Australia under the privacy spotlight</title><description>AI adoption must now be on every board room and executive team’s agenda as an emerging area of risk and regulatory focus. This issue has been given further impetus by a number of key developments across Australia’s multi-jurisdictional landscape. </description><pubDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2024 14:20:55 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lisa Fitzgerald, Bernard O'Shea, Ka-Chi Cheung, Peter Mulligan</dc:creator></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{2D808574-9DEA-4559-B4DB-154B3EE5DA2D}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2024/11/selecting-the-right-legal-genai-tool-for-your-practice</link><category>Artificial intelligence</category><category>Blog post</category><title>Selecting the right legal GenAI tool for your practice</title><description>The legal industry is on the brink of transformation with the integration of Generative AI (GenAI). Understanding which AI solutions fit your practice is crucial to enhancing productivity.</description><pubDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2024 14:16:20 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"></dc:creator></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{7C86CE0F-9D30-45EA-8F14-C2D230706C58}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2024/11/california-and-artificial-intelligence-laws-transparency-in-training</link><a10:author><a10:name>Chuck Hollis</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Susan Linda Ross</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Herwin Jorsling</a10:name></a10:author><category>Artificial intelligence</category><category>Blog post</category><title>California and artificial intelligence laws: Transparency in training</title><description>On September 29, 2024, California enacted another law relating to artificial intelligence. This one is focused on the transparency in training generative AI (AB 2013), and will take effect on January 1, 2026.</description><pubDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2024 14:08:49 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chuck Hollis, Susan Linda Ross, Herwin Jorsling</dc:creator></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{BF5C99C5-CE7A-44F3-9C20-78E4795EA4CD}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2024/11/dont-throw-the-ai-baby-out-with-the-data-leakage-bath-water-reading-ai-snake-oil</link><a10:author><a10:name>Steven B. Roosa</a10:name></a10:author><category>Artificial intelligence</category><category>Blog post</category><title>Don’t throw the AI baby out with the data leakage bath water: Reading “AI Snake Oil” with a spirit of optimism</title><description>The privacy-cyber world seems preoccupied with issues related to the nexus between personal data and AI. Those issues, although important, are dwarfed by a more pressing and fundamental question: can we get AI to do useful things reliably and accurately in the realm of predicting significant human outcomes, such as health, criminal propensity, credit risk, etc. (“Predictive AI”)?  </description><pubDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2024 14:02:35 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steven B. Roosa</dc:creator></item></channel></rss>