<rss xmlns:a10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Product liability</title><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/rss/product-liability</link><description>Recent blog posts</description><language>en</language><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{1F825285-EBDB-4F30-8B73-E958E41AF262}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2026/08/autonomous-vehicles-how-liability-is-shifting-beyond-drivers</link><a10:author><a10:name>Martyn Taylor</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Marcus Evans</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Lucy Bruce Jones</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Ray Giblett</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Dietrich Marquardt</a10:name></a10:author><category>Automotive and e-Mobility</category><category>Insurance</category><category>Product liability</category><category>Blog post</category><title>Autonomous vehicles: How liability is shifting beyond drivers</title><description>We discuss how different regulatory frameworks for driverless cars across the UK, US and Australia are extending to manufacturers, operators and software providers.</description><pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2026 15:13:05 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Martyn Taylor, Marcus Evans, Lucy Bruce Jones, Ray Giblett, Dietrich Marquardt</dc:creator></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{CAE64AC9-2B08-45DA-8F4B-4A8B11219F9E}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2026/08/ai-in-litigation-series-openai-sued-over-chatgpt-harmful-health-advice</link><a10:author><a10:name>Susana Medeiros</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Jeff Wurzburg</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Ethan Glenn</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Kathleen Rubinstein</a10:name></a10:author><category>Blog post</category><category>Artificial intelligence</category><category>Product liability</category><category>Regulation</category><category>Life sciences and healthcare</category><category>Technology</category><title>AI in litigation series: OpenAI sued over ChatGPT harmful health advice</title><description>In this post, we cover Winters v. OpenAI, Inc. et al., a San Francisco Superior Court lawsuit filed by Scott Winters, a 55-year-old Florida pastor who claims that responses from ChatGPT-4o contributed to a near-fatal pulmonary embolism.</description><pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 14:11:00 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Susana Medeiros, Jeff Wurzburg, Ethan Glenn, Kathleen Rubinstein</dc:creator></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{C96DFF68-C905-43D9-AF15-1567901AE486}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2026/06/a-new-anchor-for-patent-claims-expanding-upc-jurisdiction-through-compliance-roles</link><a10:author><a10:name>Clemens Rübel</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Maximilian Schmitz</a10:name></a10:author><category>Intellectual property</category><category>Product liability</category><category>Blog post</category><title>A new anchor for patent claims: Expanding UPC jurisdiction through compliance roles</title><description>The CJEU’s forthcoming decision on so called “long arm jurisdiction”, under which courts have assumed jurisdiction beyond the limits of strictly national or contractually defined territories could enable far-reaching centralisation of patent litigation in the EU, turning authorised representatives into jurisdictional anchors and significantly increasing procedural and liability risks for global market participants.</description><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 08:25:17 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Clemens Rübel, Maximilian Schmitz</dc:creator></item></channel></rss>