<rss xmlns:a10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Product liability</title><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/rss/product-liability</link><description>Recent blog posts</description><language>en</language><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{C96DFF68-C905-43D9-AF15-1567901AE486}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2026/06/a-new-anchor-for-patent-claims-expanding-upc-jurisdiction-through-compliance-roles</link><a10:author><a10:name>Clemens Rübel</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Maximilian Schmitz</a10:name></a10:author><category>Intellectual property</category><category>Product liability</category><category>Blog post</category><title>A new anchor for patent claims: Expanding UPC jurisdiction through compliance roles</title><description>The CJEU’s forthcoming decision on so called “long arm jurisdiction”, under which courts have assumed jurisdiction beyond the limits of strictly national or contractually defined territories could enable far-reaching centralisation of patent litigation in the EU, turning authorised representatives into jurisdictional anchors and significantly increasing procedural and liability risks for global market participants.</description><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 08:25:17 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Clemens Rübel, Maximilian Schmitz</dc:creator></item></channel></rss>