<rss xmlns:a10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>September 2022</title><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/rss/september-2022</link><description>Recent blog posts</description><language>en</language><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{B34FF419-E9FE-4F7D-A8D6-655E7FF89E93}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2022/09/a-new-approach-to-referrals-under-the-eu-merger-regulation</link><a10:author><a10:name>Heiko Bertelmann</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Sean Murphy</a10:name></a10:author><category>Antitrust and competition</category><category>Corporate</category><category>Regulation</category><category>Technology</category><category>Life sciences and healthcare</category><category>Blog post</category><title>A new approach to referrals under the EU Merger Regulation</title><description>The European Commission (along with the US FTC and DOJ, UK CMA, German FCO and others), has been focused on ensuring that so-called “killer acquisitions” in the digital and life sciences sectors are reviewed. Against this background, the General Court’s decision in Illumina/Grail is of key importance to companies acquiring start-ups.</description><pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2022 09:06:05 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Heiko Bertelmann, Sean Murphy</dc:creator></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{BFE76867-4A3C-4D6D-8134-AB36F0FF0E3E}</guid><link>https://www.insidetechlaw.com/blog/2022/09/absence-of-evidence-stalls-misleading-advertising-class-action</link><a10:author><a10:name>Randy Sutton</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Maya Angenot</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Vincent Rochette</a10:name></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Lara Mason</a10:name></a10:author><category>Technology</category><category>Blog post</category><category>Automotive and e-Mobility</category><title>Absence of evidence stalls misleading advertising class action</title><description>The recent dismissal of a class action against Ford confirms the utility of summary judgment motions in class actions, particularly when the evidence advanced to support the plaintiffs’ claims was found by the court to be insufficient and contrary to common sense. </description><pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2022 10:37:00 Z</pubDate><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Randy Sutton, Maya Angenot, Vincent Rochette, Lara Mason</dc:creator></item></channel></rss>