Topic: Artificial intelligence

New guidance sets strict privacy and accountability expectations for AI scribes, helping healthcare organizations safeguard sensitive patient data.

A webinar unpacking the privacy and cybersecurity guardrails organizations need as AI agents become embedded in everyday systems.

This webinar explores practical privacy and security measures organisations need as AI agents become integrated into business systems and workflows.

Courts are beginning to define how companies should consider retaining outputs generated by GenAI tools.

Governor Kathy Hochul signed the Responsible AI Safety and Education Act.

Courts are increasingly sanctioning lawyers who submit briefs containing AI generated “hallucinations,” such as fabricated cases or misquoted legal authorities, emphasizing that attorneys remain fully responsible for verifying accuracy.

A recent decision by the German Hanseatic Higher Regional Court (OLG Hamburg, 5 U 104/24, 10 December 2025) in the case of Robert Kneschke v. LAION e.V. provides the first appellate-level guidance in Germany on questions surrounding copyright exceptions for text and data mining (TDM) and scientific research in the context of AI training.

Texas enacted new legislation that staked out an early position in AI regulation.

Thailand’s legal sector, both the courts and the Lawyers Council, is beginning to develop frameworks, standards and guiding principles for AI utilization by lawyers and the judiciary that aim to maximize public benefit while ensuring transparency, accountability and the preservation of human decision-making authority.

The Regional Court of Munich (LG München I) has issued a landmark judgment in GEMA v OpenAI (Case No. 42 O 14139/24), holding that the use of copyrighted song lyrics for training generative AI models without a licence violates German copyright law.