Topic: Regulation

For the past two years, much of the discussion around AI in the legal space has focused on sanctions for hallucinated citations and fabricated quotations, and lawyers' professional obligations to verify AI-generated content.

Online platforms, gaming companies and AI chat services could face new obligations under proposed EU legislation designed to protect children online.

Proposed UK reforms could place greater responsibility on digital service providers to combat fraud.

Türkiye’s Ministry of Industry and Technology has published an AI Action Plan, establishing a legal-ethical framework, reflecting the EU's risk-based approach.

Recent scrutiny of automated government systems in Australia highlights the need to balance efficiency with lawful, transparent and fair decision-making.

The launch of WAICO highlights competing AI governance models that could affect supply chains, procurement, and data centre investment decisions.

The Australian government is monitoring AI-related competition issues, including dark patterns, agentic AI liability and scrutiny of partnerships.

In this post, we cover Winters v. OpenAI, Inc. et al., a San Francisco Superior Court lawsuit filed by Scott Winters, a 55-year-old Florida pastor who claims that responses from ChatGPT-4o contributed to a near-fatal pulmonary embolism.

On 16 June 2026, the UK government announced the new “National Quantum Standards Network”, a world-first national framework for quantum standards to coordinate standards for quantum technologies.

Norton Rose Fulbright has been closely monitoring a growing body of decisions released in 2026, that address whether GenAI prompts and outputs are entitled to privilege protections.